Fantastic post, dear one! Luke Beardon is incredible, and I love the work that he does! Thank you so much for writing this 👏🏼👍🏼💖
(I meant to post this on my “reblog blog”, but I didn’t select that one before hitting the “reblog” button, so it’s fine to stay here. Hell, I’ll probably put it on that blog, too 😉 )
There are two terms I sometimes see people get mixed up when talking about autistic (or otherwise non-neurotypical) people. Those terms are neurodivergent and neurodiverse (used as adjectives), or neurodivergence and neurodiversity (used as nouns). Others have explained the differences before, of course, but I wanted to walk through my own thinking on the matter.
Neurodivergent is used to describe an individual (or homogeneous group) whose neurotype diverges from what is considered typical. There are several ways in which to be neurodivergent: one might be autistic, ADHD, or dyslexic, to give just a few examples. Neurodiverse would then describe a group of people with a diversity of neurotypes represented.
So an individual would not be considered neurodiverse — she would be neurodivergent, and possibly part of a neurodiverse group. But if a group consists solely of individuals with the same type of neurodivergence, it wouldn’t properly be called neurodiverse. A…
View original post 279 more words